30 octubre, 2012

Obama Is Even in TV Ad Race Despite PACs

Filed under: International — Etiquetas: , — soynadie @ 10:41

Despite repeated warnings from President Obama and his party that a flood of unrestricted donations from conservatives to outside groups would swamp them, the White House and its allies are at least holding their own. Over the last month, the pro-Obama forces have run more ads and, more critically, have reached audiences in roughly the same numbers as Mitt Romney and the group of well-financed conservative super PACs working to elect him. A review of data from the last 30 days from Kantar Media/CMAG, which tracks political ad placements, shows that 160,000 commercials supporting the president have run, compared with 140,000 for Mr. Romney. And the Obama campaign and its supporters have broadcast more ads during the morning news and prime-time periods when television viewership is highest. Though the disparity has started to narrow somewhat over the last week, with Republicans gaining a decisive advantage in places like Cleveland and Des Moines, the story in battleground states has been the same for much of the last month: even at their most effective, the super PACs have helped Mr. Romney fight only to a draw. The lack of a discernible Republican advantage is all the more surprising because Mr. Romney and conservatives have been spending more money. Over all, total Republican ad spending for the presidential campaign is about $500 million. Democrats have put in close to $400 million. Yet unpublished estimates of how many people are seeing the ads, based on Nielsen ratings, show that over all, neither side has been getting into significantly more homes. In Ohio, Iowa and Wisconsin, for example, Republicans have put down considerably higher amounts in local television markets — sometimes by a 3-to-2 margin. But that spending did not translate into a commensurate advantage with viewers, audience data available to the presidential campaigns showed. In Florida and New Hampshire, in fact, pro-Obama ads have been reaching considerably more people, the data showed. But Mr. Romney and his supporters have started to buy more advertising time. And with eight days until the election, there is still plenty of time for them to increase their engagement. But Mr. Obama has been helped by a structural advantage, stemming from differences in the ways he, Mr. Romney and their allies have built their war chests. Both men are on track to raise $1 billion along with their parties this election cycle, with much of the money budgeted for advertising. And when the super PACs are included, the final tally will include hundreds of millions of dollars more, most of that benefiting Republicans. Mr. Romney has raised a much larger proportion of his money to date for the Republican National Committee. But Mr. Obama and the Democrats, buoyed by millions of small donors, have raised a vast majority of his cash directly for his campaign committee, which under federal law is entitled to preferential ad rates over political parties and super PACs. On the Republican side, super PAC spending has been a far greater necessity because of the Romney campaign’s cash shortages over the summer. More than half of pro-Romney advertising spending to date has come from super PACs, which sometimes pay double and triple what candidates pay for TV time. For example, in Florida over the last month, both sides reserved roughly the same amount of time — at $25 million each. But the audience reach of the pro-Obama ads was far greater, sometimes by 20 percent, audience data showed. The Obama campaign believes that the differences between its advertising strategy and the Republicans’ efforts, which are more disjointed, are helpful in other ways. First, it can control almost all of the advertising placement and timing itself. Second, though it has benefited greatly from more than $100 million in advertising from its super PAC, the Obama campaign has not had to rely nearly as heavily on outside groups, which campaigns are prohibited by law from coordinating with. “It’s nice to control your own destiny,” said Larry Grisolano, the director of paid media for the Obama campaign. That is not to say that the Obama strategy is not without inefficiencies or unexpected expense. In fact, the campaign said it had spent more in the last three weeks than it initially budgeted.



Dejar un comentario »

Aún no hay comentarios.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI


Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Google+ photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google+. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )


Conectando a %s

Blog de

A %d blogueros les gusta esto: